From Ballotpedia

Bound to: navigation, search

Nikki Haley

Image of Nikki Haley

Prior offices

Due south Carolina House of Representatives District 87

Governor of Due south Carolina

U.S. Ambassador to the Un

Education

Personal

Run into also: Nikki Haley (Governor of Due south Carolina)

Nimrata "Nikki" Randhawa Haley served as the 29th U.Due south. ambassador to the United nations from to Jan 27, 2017, to December 31, 2018. She served in the Trump administration.

Trump asked Haley to serve as U.North. ambassador on November 23, 2016. She was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on Jan 24, 2017, past a 96-iv vote.[1] [2]

On Oct 9, 2018, Haley announced that she would resign from the position at the cease of the yr to take a break from public service. Haley said, "It's been eight years of intense time and I'm a big laic in term limits. You take to be selfless enough to know when you step aside and allow someone else to practice the chore."[three]

While sitting in the Oval Office together, President Donald Trump said of Haley, "She's done a fantastic task and we've done a fantastic job together."[3]

The U.S. ambassador to the U.N. is responsible for assisting the President of the The states and the U.Southward. Department of State in conducting U.S. policy at the United Nations, an international organization founded in 1945 with 193 fellow member states.[4] [5]

Haley previously served as the 116th governor of Southward Carolina from 2011 to 2017. From 2005 to 2010, Haley served in the Southward Carolina Business firm of Representatives, representing District 87, Lexington County.

Biography

Nimrata Nikki Randhawa was born in Bamberg, South Carolina, on Jan 20, 1972. Her parents—Sikh immigrants Dr. Ajit Singh Randhawa and Raj Kaur Randhawa—migrated to the state from the Amritsar District of Punjab, India. Haley has 2 brothers, Mitti and Charan, and one sister, Simran. She graduated from Orangeburg Preparatory School and earned her B.S. in accounting from Clemson Academy in 1994. After finishing college, Haley was hired at FCR Corporation, a waste management and recycling visitor. She later became the chief financial officeholder for her family unit's clothing business, Exotica International, which her mother opened as a gift shop when Haley was a kid. At 13, Haley was put in charge of the company's accounting. As an adult, Haley was promoted to CFO and helped aggrandize Exotica International into a multimillion-dollar visitor.[6] [7]

Career

Below is an abbreviated outline of Haley'southward academic, professional person, and political career:[8]

  • January 27, 2017 - Dec 31, 2018: U.Southward. Ambassador to the Un
  • Jan 12, 2011 - Jan 24, 2017: Governor of South Carolina
  • Jan 3, 2005 - November 8, 2010: Member of the South Carolina Business firm of Representatives
  • 2003 - 2004: Member of the National Association of Women Business Owners
  • 2004: Treasurer of the National Association of Women Business Owners
  • 2003: Member of the Lexington Bedchamber of Commerce
  • 1998: Member of the Orangeburg Canton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors
  • 1994: Graduated from Clemson University

Confirmation vote

Senate vote

On January 24, 2017, the Senate voted 96-4 to ostend Haley equally U.Due south. ambassador to the U.N. Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) voted against her confirmation.[ii]

Haley testified earlier the Senate Foreign Relations Commission on January 18, 2017.[9]

Nikki Haley confirmation vote, Jan 24, 2017
Party Votes for Approved a Votes against Defeated d Total votes
Democratic Party Democrats 43 3 46
Republican Party Republicans 52 0 52
Grey.png Independents ane one 2
Full Votes 96 4 100

Bug

Climate alter

See besides: Federal policy on the Paris Climate Agreement, 2017 and Federal policy on climate change, 2017
  • During an interview on August viii, 2017, Haley discussed climatic change and the Paris Climate agreement. Haley said, "Just considering we pulled out of the Paris accord doesn't mean we don't believe in climate protection. I think we're very aware that we need to practise that. What we're saying is, nosotros're not going to sell out American businesses to do that. ... We're not saying that climate change is not existent. It is real. It's how do you take that balance between making sure you've got jobs and businesses moving and then besides making certain you protect your climate. That answer's in the middle."[ten]

Islamic republic of iran

See also: Federal policy on Iran, 2017-2020
  • On August 31, 2017, later on the new leader of Hamas said that "Tehran was again its biggest provider of money and arms," Haley said, "Iran is showing its true colours. Iran must make up one's mind whether it wants to be a member of the community of nations that tin can be expected to accept its international obligations seriously or whether information technology wants to be the leader of a jihadist terrorist movement. Information technology cannot be both. It's long past fourth dimension for the international customs to concord Iran to the aforementioned standard that all countries who really value peace and security are held to."[xi]
  • On April twenty, 2017, Haley criticized Islamic republic of iran for attempting to destabilize the Middle East. She said, "If we are speaking honestly about disharmonize in the Eye East, nosotros demand to get-go with the main culprit: Islamic republic of iran and its partner militia, Hizballah. Iran and Hizballah conspire together to destabilize the Center East, and their actions are expanding."[12]

Iran nuclear deal

See also: Federal policy on the Iran nuclear deal, 2017-2020
  • On September five, 2017, during a spoken language at the American Enterprise Institute, Haley discussed the nuclear deal. She said, "The truth is, the Islamic republic of iran deal has and so many flaws that it's tempting to exit information technology. Simply, the bargain was constructed in a way that makes leaving information technology less bonny. It gave Islamic republic of iran what information technology wanted up-forepart, in exchange for temporary promises to evangelize what nosotros want. That's not good. ... Much has been written about the JCPOA. I won't repeat information technology all here. Let's just say that the agreement falls brusque of what was promised. We were promised an 'terminate' to the Iranian nuclear program. What emerged was not an end, just a pause. Nether the bargain, Iran will continue to enrich uranium and develop advanced centrifuges. We were promised 'anytime, anywhere' inspections of sites in Islamic republic of iran. The last agreement delivered much less. The promised 24/vii inspections apply only to Islamic republic of iran's 'declared' nuclear sites. For any undeclared just suspected sites, the regime tin can deny access for up to 24 days. Then at that place's the deal's expiration dates. After ten years, the limits on uranium, advanced centrifuges, and other nuclear restrictions begin to evaporate. And in less than 10 years, they have the opportunity to upgrade their capabilities in various ways. The JCPOA is, therefore, a very flawed and very express agreement. Just even so, Iran has been caught in multiple violations over the past year and a half. In February 2016 – merely a calendar month afterwards the agreement was implemented – the IAEA discovered Iran had exceeded its allowable limit of heavy water. Nine months subsequently, Iran exceeded the heavy water limit once again. Both times, the Obama Administration helped Iran become back into compliance and refused to declare it a violation."[thirteen]
  • Haley likewise spoke most the penalty provisions in the deal maxim, "Some other major flaw in the JCPOA is its penalty provisions. Whether an Iranian violation is large or small – whether it is deemed to be cloth or not-cloth – the bargain provides for only ane penalty. That penalty is the re-imposition of sanctions. And if sanctions are re-imposed, Iran is then freed from all the commitments information technology made. Recall almost that. At that place is an absurdly round logic to enforcement of this deal. Penalizing its violations don't make the deal stronger, they blow information technology up. Iran'southward leaders know this. They are counting on the world brushing off relatively minor infractions, or fifty-fifty relatively major ones. They are counting on the United States and the other parties to the agreement being then invested in its success that they overlook Iranian cheating. That is exactly what our previous administration did. It is this unwillingness to challenge Iranian behavior, for fear of damaging the nuclear agreement, that gets to the heart of the threat the deal poses to our national security. The Iranian nuclear deal was designed to be likewise big to fail. The deal drew an bogus line between the Iranian regime's nuclear development and the residue of its lawless behavior. Information technology said 'we've made this deal on the nuclear side, so none of the regime's other bad beliefs is important plenty to threaten the nuclear understanding.' The result is that for advocates of the deal, everything in our human relationship with the Iranian regime must now be subordinated to the preservation of the agreement."[13]
  • Speaking about the Corker-Cardin constabulary that requires the president to certify that Iran is upholding its end of the bargain, Haley said, "We must consider the authorities'southward repeated, demonstrated hostility toward the United States. Nosotros must consider its history of charade virtually its nuclear programme. We must consider its ongoing development of ballistic missile engineering. In short, nosotros must consider the whole picture, not merely whether Iran has exceeded the JCPOA's limit on uranium enrichment. We must consider the whole jigsaw puzzle, not only i of its pieces."[thirteen]
  • On August 25, 2017, Haley called on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the agency responsible for making certain Iran meets its obligations nether the nuclear bargain, to access and investigate Iranian military bases. She said, "I accept skillful confidence in the IAEA, but they are dealing with a country that has a clear history of lying and pursuing covert nuclear programs. We are encouraging the IAEA to utilise all the authorities they have and to pursue every bending possible. ... The JCPOA made no distinction between military and not-military sites. At that place are too numerous undeclared sites that have not been inspected. That is a trouble." Islamic republic of iran said that information technology would not requite the IAEA access to its military sites. Under the deal, the IAEA could asking admission to Islamic republic of iran's military machine sites, but it would have to cite a reason for doing and so. Haley was in Vienna, Austria, at the IAEA'south headquarters as part of the Trump administration'due south review of the nuclear bargain.[14]
  • On August 15, 2017, Haley criticized Iranian President Hassan Rouhani for threatening to carelessness the nuclear agreement within hours if the U.S. imposed new sanctions. She said, "Islamic republic of iran cannot be immune to use the nuclear deal to hold the globe earnest. Iran, under no circumstances, tin ever exist allowed to take nuclear weapons. At the same time, notwithstanding, nosotros must also continue to hold Iran responsible for its missile launches, support for terrorism, disregard for human rights, and violations of UN Security Council resolutions. The nuclear deal must not go 'too big to fail.'"[15] [16]

Israel and Palestine

See as well: Federal policy on State of israel and Palestine, 2017-2020
  • During an interview on December x, 2017, Haley discussed Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem equally the capital of Israel. She said, "This basically says that the The states acknowledges that the capital of Israel is Jerusalem, and saying besides that the embassy is going to be moved to the capital letter, merely like information technology is in almost every other country. In Israel, in Jerusalem, you have got the Parliament, you have got the president, you have got the prime minister, you have got the Supreme Court. And so, why shouldn't we accept the embassy there? Secondly, I will tell you that, for 22 years, you have had presidents and the American people enquire for the embassy to be moved. And no president, non -- not Clinton, non Bush, non Obama, actually made -- had the courage to brand that move and listen to the will of the American people. The Senate only overwhelmingly again voted to have the diplomatic mission moved. So, the president did the will of the people. When it comes to those that are upset, we knew that was going to happen. But courage does cause that. When yous brand a conclusion, you are going to accept some that run across it negatively and y'all're going to have some that see it positively. But I strongly believe this is going to movement the ball forward for the peace process."[17]
  • On February 10, 2017, the U.South. delegation to the United Nations objected to the engagement of onetime Palestinian Authority Prime number Minister Salam Fayyad as a special representative for Great socialist people's libyan arab jamahiriya. Haley said in a statement, "For too long the UN has been unfairly biased in favor of the Palestinian Authority to the detriment of our allies in Israel. The United States does not currently recognize a Palestinian land or support the point this appointment would ship inside the United nations, however, we encourage the 2 sides to come together directly on a solution. Going forwards the Us will act, not only talk, in support of our allies."[xviii] [xix]
  • During her confirmation hearing for the mail of U.S. ambassador to the United Nations on Jan 18, 2017, Nikki Haley condemned the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, which seeks to protestation Israeli settlements in Palestinian territory by economically harming Israel. She said, "I volition not go to New York and abjure when the Un seeks to create an international surroundings that encourages boycotts of Israel. In fact, I pledge to you lot this: I will never abstain when the United nations takes whatsoever action that comes in direct conflict with the interests and values of the United States."[20] In June 2015, Haley signed into South Carolina law a prohibition on the state contracting with businesses engaged in boycotts on the basis of race, faith, gender, or national origin.[21] Haley also characterized the passage of UN Resolution 2334—defining Israeli settlements as legally invalid—as evidence of UN bias confronting Israel. When asked by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) how she would accost the furnishings of this resolution, Haley said that Israel must be reassured that it is an marry by the White House, Congress, and the National Security Council. She added that the U.S. diplomatic mission should be relocated from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.[22]

NATO

See as well: Federal policy on NATO, 2017-2020
  • On June four, 2017, Haley said the U.S. supports Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, NATO's founding treaty, which established the principle of collective defence. It states that "an assault against one or several members is considered as an attack against all." She said, "Of course we believe in Article 5. I merely met with all of my NATO ambassadors yesterday. Nosotros said, 'A threat on ane of u.s.a. is a threat on all of us.' ... NATO is going to continue to exist strong. It's going to go along to be united. Russia'south going to try and separate it, but the truth is we've never swayed from Article 5." When asked why Trump did not specifically mention Article v during his trip to NATO headquarters, Haley said, "I think if you asked him if he was in favor of Commodity 5, he would say that yes, he is."[23] [24]

N Korea

See also: Federal policy on Democratic people's republic of korea, 2017-2020
  • On September 11, 2017, afterward the United Nations Security Council adopted a resolution placing sanctions on North Korea, Haley said, "Today, we are saying the world volition never have a nuclear-armed Democratic people's republic of korea. And today, the Security Council is saying that if the Northward Korean regime does non halt its nuclear program, nosotros will human activity to stop it ourselves. ... Previous efforts to bring Due north Korea to the negotiating table have failed. They have repeatedly walked back every commitment they have made. Today, the Security Council has acted in a unlike way. Today, we are attempting to take the future of the N Korean nuclear program out of the hands of its outlaw regime. We are done trying to prod the regime to do the correct thing. We are now acting to stop it from having the ability to continue doing the wrong thing. We are doing that past striking North Korea's power to fuel and fund its weapons program. Oil is the lifeblood of North Korea's try to build and deliver a nuclear weapon. Today's resolution reduces virtually 30 percent of oil provided to North korea by cut off over 55 percent of its gas, diesel, and heavy fuel oil. Further, today'southward resolution completely bans natural gas and other oil byproducts that could be used as substitutes for the reduced petroleum. This will cut deep. ... We don't take pleasure in further strengthening sanctions today. We are not looking for state of war. The North Korean regime has not notwithstanding passed the point of no return. If information technology agrees to terminate its nuclear program, it can reclaim its future. If it proves it can live in peace, the world volition alive in peace with it. On the other hand, if North korea continues its unsafe path, nosotros will keep with farther pressure." The resolution limited North korea's oil imports, banned material exports, and banned well-nigh overseas laborer contracts.[25] [26]
  • On September 4, 2017, after Democratic people's republic of korea conducted its 6th test of a nuclear weapon since 2006, Haley said, "To the members of the Security Council, I must say, enough is enough. We accept taken an incremental approach, and despite the best of intentions, information technology has non worked. The time has come up to exhaust all diplomatic means to end this crisis. Simply the strongest sanctions will enable us to solve this problem through diplomacy." She added that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was "begging for war." Haley also said that "the United States will look at every country that does business with North korea equally a state that is giving assist to their reckless and dangerous nuclear intentions."[27]
  • On August 5, 2017, the United Nations unanimously passed a resolution that placed sanctions on North korea for its efforts to develop nuclear weapons. The resolution banned Due north Korean exports of coal, iron, iron ore, lead, pb ore, and seafood, which could price Democratic people's republic of korea $3 billion in annual export revenue, co-ordinate to Reuters.[28] After the vote, Haley thanked her United nations colleagues for "sending a strong message to the N Korean regime." Part of her statement appears beneath.
" This resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever leveled against the Northward Korean regime. The toll the North Korean leadership volition pay for its connected nuclear and missile evolution volition exist the loss of 1-third of its exports and difficult currency. This is the about stringent set of sanctions on any state in a generation. These sanctions will cutting deep, and in doing so, will requite the North Korean leadership a sense of taste of the deprivation they have chosen to inflict on the N Korean people. ... I give thanks each and every one of my colleagues who worked so difficult to bring this resolution to a vote. I accept previously pointed out that China has a disquisitional role to play on matters related to North Korea. I desire to personally thank the Chinese delegation for the important contributions they fabricated to this resolution. While the Security Council has washed expert work, the members of the Security Council – and all Un Member States – must do more than to increase the pressure on Democratic people's republic of korea. We must work together to fully implement the sanctions nosotros imposed today and those imposed in past resolutions. The step nosotros accept together today is an important one. But nosotros should not fool ourselves into thinking we have solved the problem. Non even close. The North Korean threat has not left united states. It is rapidly growing more unsafe. We've seen two ICBMs fired in only the last month. Further activity is required. ... Our goal remains a stable Korean peninsula, at peace, without nuclear weapons. We want only security and prosperity for all nations – including North korea. Until so, this resolution and prior ones will be implemented to the fullest to maximize pressure on North Korea to change its means.[29] "
—Nikki Haley[thirty]
  • During an interview on April 24, 2017, Haley said, "I think that Democratic people's republic of korea's been playing games from the very beginning. What we're seeing is that Kim Jong Un is trying to really show his force to the people of Northward Korea, whether it'southward simply with all of these threats or what he'southward trying to do in terms of talking in terms of trying to start a war. And what nosotros've said is nosotros don't desire war, and then don't start one." Haley also said that the relationship between the U.S. and China had grown stronger in response to North korea's threats to continue testing missiles. She said that China has "shown genuine concern. I think that they are trying to put the pressure on North Korea, and I think it's working."[31]
  • During the same interview Haley said that the U.S. and China were working together to secure the release of Tony Kim, a U.Southward. citizen and professor, who was detained in North korea on April 22, 2017.[31]

Pakistan

  • On January ii, 2018, Haley said that the United States would withhold $255 1000000 in aid from Pakistan for failing to fight terrorism. She said, "The administration is withholding $255 one thousand thousand in assistance to Pakistan. At that place are clear reasons for this. Pakistan has played a double game for years. They piece of work with united states of america at times, and they also harbor the terrorists that attack our troops in Afghanistan. That game is not acceptable to this administration. … We expect far more cooperation from Islamic republic of pakistan in the fight against terrorism. The president is willing to go to great lengths to end all funding from Islamic republic of pakistan as they continue to harbor and support terrorism."[32]

Russia

See besides: Federal policy on Russia, 2017-2020
  • On April 10, 2018, after the Syrian government allegedly attacked Syrians with chemical weapons leaving more than than 70 expressionless, Haley blamed Russia, saying, "The Russian government, whose hands are all covered in the blood of Syrian children, cannot be aback past pictures of its victims. We must non overlook Russian federation and Iran's roles in enabling the Assad regime's murderous destruction."[33]
  • On July 8, 2017, Haley commented on Trump'south coming together with Putin at the G20 summit. She said, "[Trump] wanted him to basically expect him in the eye, let him know that yes, we know you meddled in our elections. Yes we know you did it, cut it out. And I think President Putin did exactly what we idea he would practice, which is deny it. This is Russia trying to salve face. And they can't. They can't. Everybody knows that Russia meddled in our elections. Everybody knows that they're not just meddling in the Usa' election. They're doing this beyond multiple continents, and they're doing this in a way that they're trying to cause chaos within the countries."[34]
  • During her confirmation hearing for the postal service of U.South. ambassador to the United nations on January 18, 2017, Haley said that the U.S. should be cautious with Russia and that its military actions, like the annexation of Crimea, were cause for concern. She too agreed with Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) that Russia had committed war crimes by indiscriminately striking civilian targets in Aleppo, Syria. When asked by Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Dr..) to discuss maintaining and strengthening sanctions against Russia, Haley said, "I call up that Russia has to have positive actions before we lift sanctions. … What I practice believe is important is that nosotros get together with the National Security Quango and the president-elect and we decide a plan for Russia: what nosotros expect from them, what we plan on looking at as we go forward, what violations will trigger additional sanctions, and when we say it, nosotros should do it and follow through with it."[35]

Syrian arab republic

Run into too: Federal policy on Syrian arab republic, 2017-2020
  • On April 10, 2018, afterward the Syrian government allegedly attacked Syrians with chemical weapons leaving more seventy dead, Haley criticized Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, saying, "Merely a monster does this. Merely a monster targets civilians and ensures there are no ambulances to transfer the wounded. No hospitals or medicine to ease their pain. The monster who was responsible for these attacks has no conscious [sic]."[33]

Personal

Note: Please contact united states if the personal information below requires an update.
Haley and her husband, Michael, accept 2 children. Michael Haley, a member of the U.S. National Guard, spent eleven months in Afghanistan training local farmers to abound new types of crops. He was deployed during the second year of Haley's beginning term every bit governor.[36] [37]

In 2012, Haley published Can't is Non an Selection, an autobiography. In the book, Haley wrote most her personal experiences growing up, including her experiences with child corruption. She also discussed her experiences in politics.[38]

Recent News

The link below is to the most contempo stories in a Google news search for the terms Nikki Haley U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See besides

  • Donald Trump potential loftier-level administration appointments
  • Nikki Haley (Governor of South Carolina)

Footnotes

  1. ↑ The Post and Courier, "Gov. Nikki Haley picked to become United nations ambassador, sources say," Nov 23, 2016
  2. ↑ two.0 2.one Senate.gov, "On the Nomination (Confirmation Nikki R. Haley, of Southward Carolina, to exist Representative of the Us to the United Nations, in the Security Council and to the Sessions of the General Associates)," January 24, 2017
  3. ↑ 3.0 three.1 The Hill, "Haley resigns as US ambassador to Un," October nine, 2018
  4. ↑ USUN.State.gov, "About," accessed Apr 24, 2017
  5. ↑ United nations.org, "About," accessed April 24, 2017
  6. ↑ The New York Times, "All Her Life, Nikki Haley Was the Different One," June thirteen, 2010
  7. ↑ Asian Tribune, "Nikki Haley: Daughter of Indian Sikh immigrants destined to be Southward Carolina Governor," June 12, 2010
  8. ↑ Welcome to the Southward Carolina State Legislature, "Representative Nikki Randhawa Haley," archived December 19, 2007
  9. ↑ U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Commission, "Nomination Hearing," January 18, 2017
  10. ↑ The Hill, "Haley: No reason for Trump administration to reject climate change study," August 8, 2017
  11. ↑ Reuters, "U.South. says Iran shows 'true colours' by restoring Hamas ties," August 31, 2017
  12. ↑ CBS News, "Haley, Trump assistants zippo in on Iran," April 20, 2017
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.one 13.2 AEI.org, "Nikki Haley Address on Iran and the JCPOA," September v, 2017
  14. ↑ Reuters, "Nuclear inspectors should accept access to Iran military bases: Haley," August 25, 2017
  15. ↑ USUN.State.gov, "Ambassador Haley on Islamic republic of iran'southward Threats to Quit the JCPOA," August 15, 2017
  16. ↑ Reuters, "U.S. envoy says Islamic republic of iran cannot 'hold world earnest' with nuclear deal," August 15, 2017
  17. ↑ CNN, "Transcripts: Land of the Wedlock," Dec 10, 2017
  18. ↑ CNN, "United states does abrupt nigh face on Palestinian engagement to acme Un post," February 11, 2017
  19. ↑ United States Mission to the United Nations, "Statement on the Intention to Engage the Onetime Palestinian Authority Prime Government minister to Atomic number 82 the UN Mission in Libya," Feb 10, 2017
  20. ↑ Senate Foreign Relations Commission, "Opening Statement of Governor Nikki Haley," January 18, 2017
  21. ↑ The Jerusalem Post, "Southward Carolina becomes first US state to take activity confronting anti-Israel boycotts," June 5, 2015
  22. ↑ C-SPAN, "U.S. Ambassador to the Un Confirmation Hearing," January 18, 2017
  23. ↑ NATO.int, "Founding Treaty," accessed Feb 23, 2017
  24. ↑ The Colina, "Haley: Trump believes in NATO's Article 5," June four, 2017
  25. ↑ USUN.State.gov, "Remarks Following the Adoption of United nations Security Council Resolution 2375 on Due north Korea Sanctions," September 11, 2017
  26. ↑ The Wall Street Periodical, "U.N. Security Council Adopts New Sanctions Confronting North Korea," September 11, 2017
  27. ↑ ABC News, "Nikki Haley to United nations on North Korea's nuclear plan: 'Enough is plenty,'" September 4, 2017
  28. ↑ Reuters, "United nations bans key North korea exports over missile tests," August 5, 2017
  29. ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  30. ↑ USUN.State.gov, "Caption of Vote at the Adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2371 Strengthening Sanctions on North korea," Baronial 5, 2017
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.i ABC News, "Haley tells Democratic people's republic of korea, 'We don't want war, so don't start one,'" April 24, 2017
  32. ↑ The Loma, "Haley: US withholding $255M in aid from Pakistan," January 2, 2018
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 The Hill, "Haley: Russian hands 'covered in claret' from Syria attack," April 9, 2018
  34. ↑ Politician, "Haley: 'Everybody knows that Russia meddled in our elections,'" July eight, 2017
  35. ↑ C-SPAN, "U.S. Administrator to the United Nations Confirmation Hearing," Jan xviii, 2017
  36. ↑ The Land, "Haley announces run for governor," May fifteen, 2009
  37. ↑ Reuters, "Hubby of South Carolina governor returns from Afghanistan," Dec 12, 2013
  38. ↑ The Washington Mail service, "Nikki Haley opens up on childhood corruption," July 9, 2013
Political offices
Preceded by
Samantha Power 		U.Southward. ambassador to the United Nations
2017 – 2018 		Succeeded by
'
Preceded by
Mark Sanford (R) 		Governor of South Carolina
2011 – 2017 		Succeeded past
Henry McMaster (R)
Preceded by
- 		Southward Carolina House of Representatives District 87
2004 – 2010 		Succeeded by
Todd Atwater (R)

v•eastward

U.Due south. Executive Branch
Elected offices

President Joe Biden • Vice President Kamala Harris

 Executive-Branch-Logo.png
Executive departments

Section of Defense • Department of Land • Department of Homeland Security • Section of Justice • Department of Commerce • Section of Education • Department of the Treasury • Department of Agriculture • Department of Energy • Section of Labor • Department of Transportation • Department of the Interior • Section of Wellness and Human Services • Department of Veterans Affairs • Section of Housing and Urban Evolution
Cabinet-level offices

Ecology Protection Agency • Function of Management and Budget • U.S. Mission to the United Nations • Quango of Economic Advisors • Small Business Administration • White Firm Primary of Staff
Federally appointed offices

Federal Reserve System • National Security Advisor • White House Press Secretary • U.S. Postmaster General • Fundamental Intelligence Agency • Federal Bureau of Investigation • Internal Revenue Service • Bureau of Booze, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives • National Security Agency • Congressional Budget Part • Federal Ballot Commission • Transportation Security Administration • Drug Enforcement Assistants • Federal Communications Commission
Glossary

Date confirmation process • United States Constitution • Electoral Higher • Deferred activeness • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) • Deferred Action for Parents of U.Due south. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) • Impeachment of federal officials • Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) • North American Costless Trade Agreement (NAFTA) • P5+1 and E3+3 • Trade adjustment assistance (TAA) • Trade promotion authority (TPA)

v•eastward

President Donald Trump's policies
Overviews

Donald Trump • Donald Trump presidential Cabinet • Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016
Polling indexes: Opinion polling during the Trump administration

 US-WhiteHouse-Logo.svg
Domestic policy

Ballgame • Crime and justice • Instruction • Energy and the surround • Federal courts • Firearms policy • Commencement Subpoena • Healthcare • Clearing • Infrastructure • LGBTQ issues • Marijuana • Puerto Rico • Social welfare programs • Veterans • Voting issues
Economic affairs and regulations

Agronomics and nutrient policy • Budget • Financial regulation • Jobs • Social Security • Taxes • Trade
Foreign diplomacy and national security

Afghanistan • Arab states of the Persian Gulf • Red china • Cuba • Iran • Iran nuclear deal • Islamic State and terrorism • Israel and Palestine • Latin America • War machine • NATO • Democratic people's republic of korea • Puerto Rico • Russia • Syria • Syrian refugees • Technology, privacy, and cybersecurity